vg|A EC 2011 Mixed Teams 16 _,1_2,I,1,14,Hansen,0,Mahaffey,0|
rs|4SS=,4SS=,5SEx-2,6SEx-3,5DN-1,3NS+2,4HSx-2,3NW+1,3NN+2,3NN+2,6NN=,6SN=,2SW+1,2SW+1,5CE-1,4HN=,3NN+1,4HN+1,4DS+1,5DSx=,4SN-3,4SS-1,4DEx-1,3CN+1,4SS+1,5CEx-4,1NW-1,1NW-1|
pn|Schreckenb,Lev,Babsch,Levitina,Molson,Berger,Pszczola,Hansen|pg||
qx|o1|st||md|3SK943H2DJ95CAJ876,SQJ8HJ97DAK64CQ42,SAT75HAK643D3CKT9,S62HQT85DQT872C53|sv|o|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|Walddk2: Hello everyone and welcome back|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|nt|Walddk2: Round of 16, two segments of 14 boards|pg||
nt|Walddk2: N-S from Austria, E-W from USA|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dA|nt|Walddk2: North Austria, South Germany|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d8|pc|d9|pg||
pc|d4|pc|s5|pc|d7|pc|d5|pg||
nt|Walddk2: Welcome to Paul Orth|pg||
nt|pauleger: Hi Roland|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s3|pc|s8|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: Hi|pg||
nt|Walddk2: Our operator is Marek jr, welcome|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pg||
nt|Walddk2: Witam|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: Witaj Rolandzie :) |pg||
nt|pauleger: easy start|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|d2|pc|sK|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h9|pc|hA|pc|h5|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h8|pc|dJ|pc|h7|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c9|pc|c5|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c1|st||md|3SK943H2DJ95CAJ876,SQJ8HJ97DAK64CQ42,SAT75HAK643D3CKT9,S62HQT85DQT872C53|sv|o|nt|vugraphpld: hello everyone. Welcome on our last match today|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: Exciting competition between two english teams|pg||
nt|psyck: Hello everyone|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: they both play 4 Major and weak NT|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|nt|ralfwil: Hello Joanna and Krishna|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpld: redouble was alerted but lat either as balanced or transfer hand|pg||
nt|psyck: & which one does he have? :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|chick: Hello Everyone :)|pg||
pc|dA|nt|vugraphpld: propably transfer for @C:)|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d8|nt|ralfwil: an overbid from E in my opinion. 1nt is enough|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: East has alerted the redouble of Partner after 3rd round of bidding|pg||
nt|psyck: they played a relatively more normal transfer bid on 1M-(x) other table|pg||
nt|psyck: agree Ralf|pg||
pc|d5|pg||
nt|psyck: but maybe the redouble confused her as much as it did us|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: the standard lead against NT 2nd or 4th|pg||
pc|d4|nt|ralfwil: and also a danger with that stiff @cA|pg||
pc|s5|pc|d2|pc|d9|pg||
nt|Walddk8: Welcome to David Greenwood|pg||
nt|ralfwil: but cash @cA and play @d8?|pg||
nt|jtr: Hello people|pg||
nt|Walddk8: and Victor Silverstone|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: hello|pg||
nt|odysseus69: hi all|pg||
nt|chick: We're starting out with a straightforward 4@S|pg||
nt|chick: The spade suit is the interesting one here ... declarer needs to guard against QJxx, and that means taking a first round finesse in spades|pg||
pc|c9|pc|c5|pc|c6|nt|ralfwil: helloDavid and Victor|pg||
nt|odysseus69: South better rise on d8|pg||
nt|psyck: Hi David & Victor|pg||
pc|cQ|pg||
pc|d6|pc|s7|pc|d7|nt|jtr: Hi guys|pg||
nt|Walddk8: and our lovely operator, Joanna :)|pg||
pc|dJ|pg||
pc|sA|nt|odysseus69: easy to duck dQ|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s3|nt|psyck: a less imaginative @dQ than the @d8 as suggested...|pg||
nt|ralfwil: what do you think about @d8 in trick3?|pg||
pc|s8|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s6|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|dK|pc|h3|pc|dT|pc|s9|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o2|st||md|4SK7HKJ9743D64CKT4,SJ9432HQT62DQ8CJ7,SHA85DKJT95CAQ982,SAQT865HDA732C653|sv|n|mb|1S|nt|pauleger: 4@s is a good safe since 4@h seem to make |pg||
mb|p|mb|4S|nt|gulyas: hello all|pg||
mb|4N|nt|Walddk2: Welcome Daniel|pg||
nt|gulyas: Hi Roland|pg||
nt|pauleger: 5@c is interesting contract|pg||
mb|5S|nt|pauleger: X now|pg||
nt|gulyas: 5@C looks decent except for the bad @H break|pg||
nt|gulyas: if you play on @Ds, you get home, but if you think you can make with the @H suit, you will be disappointed|pg||
nt|pauleger: S has 70 % of her values not in partners suits|pg||
mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|gulyas: spec tells me they are in 6@Sx in the other room, so someone will get a swing|pg||
nt|gulyas: well done NS here, not going overboard |pg||
pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|c5|pg||
nt|gulyas: should be 5imps to Mahaffey|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|d5|pg||
pc|c6|pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d3|pc|d4|pc|d8|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c2|st||md|4SK7HKJ9743D64CKT4,SJ9432HQT62DQ8CJ7,SHA85DKJT95CAQ982,SAQT865HDA732C653|sv|n|nt|psyck: true|pg||
nt|odysseus69: unlucky 6 hearts|pg||
nt|ralfwil: but declarer didn´t take a count when played @hQ. should exit with a small @h for -1|pg||
nt|chick: South is fortunate that the spades split 3-2, otherwise could have lost a spade trick too|pg||
mb|1S|mb|2H|nt|psyck: good enough slam here needing not much more than @h break|pg||
mb|3S|nt|vugraphpld: pass was changed to 2@S|pg||
mb|6H|nt|dburn: crikey - Callaghan on the lager again|pg||
mb|6S|nt|psyck: they stopped ealily other table after N's hand was not improved by the splinter|pg||
nt|odysseus69: Brian Callaghan has been playing in his mixed team mode throughout this event|pg||
nt|dburn: but this isn't a deal where he wants to keep the opponents out of slam|pg||
nt|ralfwil: 6nt on N after a @s lead!|pg||
mb|d|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: another way of saying he is bidding on peanuts|pg||
nt|dburn: still, it's hard to keep Mrs P out of things|pg||
nt|dburn: Senior won't think he's being asked to bid six with spade control - just evaluate his hand|pg||
nt|dburn: which is pretty useless in context, given that he doubled at the three level already|pg||
nt|psyck: with his not so great holding in red suits, will pass|pg||
nt|odysseus69: just what Brian Senior wanted t hear- he knows he should bid 6 but will he?|pg||
nt|dburn: he knows he shouldn't bid six - how can he?|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: Brian looks very confused|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: the cards are next to bidding-box now and he looks at the wall:)|pg||
nt|psyck: well 5@h bid should be clear as natural & a slam try|pg||
nt|odysseus69: he has 2 and half goodies|pg||
nt|psyck: hope the paint on the wall dries off soon|pg||
nt|odysseus69: I would expect him to bid 6 - 5H is a very big bid|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|ralfwil: He can expect a bad split in @h on the bidding. |pg||
nt|vugraphpld: he explained 5@H to EAST as strong hand:)|pg||
pc|h7|nt|chick: this auction got awfully high awfully fast|pg||
nt|chick: 6@H had no chance, and 6@S even less |pg||
pc|hT|nt|dburn: just in case East thought it was pre-emptive, perhaps|pg||
pc|hA|pc|s5|pg||
nt|odysseus69: the diamonds split Ok - but its the hearts that matter|pg||
nt|ralfwil: after @cA I think S can make|pg||
nt|dburn: not clear - maybe a club back will leave declarer an entry short|pg||
nt|psyck: not clear how she can avoid 2@h losers|pg||
nt|dburn: she can contrive an endplay in most cases, but I am not sure about all cases|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|c2|pg||
pc|d2|nt|odysseus69: lets wait and see- i think can do it now|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pg||
nt|ralfwil: can make now|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d8|pg||
nt|ralfwil: nooo|pg||
nt|odysseus69: not now|pg||
nt|dburn: but she ought not to use that club early|pg||
nt|ralfwil: ruff two @s|pg||
pc|d3|pc|h4|pc|s3|pc|d5|pg||
nt|Walddk4: West's name is Berger and he is from Austria, operator please|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h5|pc|s6|nt|Walddk4: East is also from Austria|pg||
pc|h3|pg||
pc|d7|pc|h9|pc|s4|nt|Walddk4: Molson is from USA|pg||
nt|Walddk4: She has a French flag|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o3|st||md|1SKJ65HQ4DQT3CKJ96,SA87HKJ8632DA4C85,STHAT97DKJ872CAQ4,SQ9432H5D965CT732|sv|e|nt|pauleger: 2@h from W can be costly|pg||
nt|gulyas: the auction was much different in the CR, made E feel she has a cheap sacrifice (true) vs a making vul slam (not true)|pg||
mb|1C|mb|1H|nt|gulyas: still, it was safe, losing only 5 imps for the extra down|pg||
mb|2D|mb|p|nt|pauleger: Qx worth a 2NT bid?|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|nt|gulyas: I would rather bid a NF 3@D|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|nt|gulyas: N will bid 3nt now|pg||
nt|gulyas: hmm|pg||
mb|3N|nt|pauleger: now you got no choice :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|gulyas: getting to the right contract after all:)|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|mb|4H|nt|gulyas: N has a huge hand, if S had a better hand, and say @SA instead of KJ, slam maybe close|pg||
mb|p|nt|pauleger: now S wishes she had passed in the first round|pg||
nt|gulyas: right, now they may end up in 5@D which could go down|pg||
mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|gulyas: correct that: which WILL go down|pg||
nt|pauleger: cr bid 2NT on first opportunity|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|nt|gulyas: W sees the 3tricks|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h7|pc|s2|pc|h4|pg||
pc|sA|pc|sT|pc|s9|pc|s5|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h9|pc|d5|pc|dT|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c3|st||md|1SKJ65HQ4DQT3CKJ96,SA87HKJ8632DA4C85,STHAT97DKJ872CAQ4,SQ9432H5D965CT732|sv|e|nt|psyck: as David said, it looks like a @c return would have taken away the entries for 2@s ruffs & endplay|pg||
nt|dburn: plenty of values for East-West, but no tricks on a heart lead|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Berger   Austria   then all is fine|pg||
mb|1C|nt|ralfwil: I´ve been asked how to make:) @s10 to @sa and ruff 2 @s using @cQ, @hK @cK and 2 rounds of diamonds. E is endplayed|pg||
mb|1H|mb|2D|nt|Walddk4: -r  at the end  (not  t)|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Berger|pg||
mb|p|nt|Walddk4: Thanks|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3N|nt|dburn: traditional Acol for East-West - weak no trump, 2/1 forcing back to the one level|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: dont agree west's 3heart bid in CR -see what BC does|pg||
nt|dburn: what should he do?|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|chick: I don't much care for the 2N bid with no heart controls|pg||
pc|s7|nt|dburn: 2NT with no stop?|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome to Anders Kristensen|pg||
pc|sT|nt|chick: It worked out ok, since North has hearts but could have been a lot worse|pg||
nt|andersk: Ty Roland|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|sK|pg||
nt|andersk: Hi C:)|pg||
nt|chick: Hei Anders |pg||
pc|dT|nt|dburn: pass with 16 facing a two-level response?|pg||
nt|psyck: both tables choose to bid out their pattern|pg||
nt|dburn: 3@c on the singleton ace?|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d5|pg||
nt|andersk: I agree with your ciomment on that 2 NT Cornelia!|pg||
nt|andersk: I would prefeer 3 @D|pg||
mc|11|nt|andersk: worked out well, tho!|pg||
pg||
qx|o4|st||md|2S64HA6432DJ94C952,SAJHQ987DQ76CAK83,SKQT87HKJT5DCQJ74,S9532HDAKT8532CT6|sv|b|nt|gulyas: 11imps to Mahaffey, up by 16|pg||
mb|1N|mb|2C|nt|gulyas: exciting hand: NS can make 3-4@Hs, EW is close to making slam in @Ds|pg||
nt|pauleger: 5@d is on|pg||
mb|3D|nt|gulyas: with @Ds 3-0, 5@D is the limit for EW|pg||
mb|3H|mb|3N|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: pass forcing|pg||
mb|d|mb|p|nt|pauleger: now 5@d would show a very strong hand|pg||
nt|pauleger: direct 5@d would be less interested in slam|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|cA|nt|gulyas: wow, I am surprised Pepsi did not bid 4@H in virtually the same auction|pg||
nt|gulyas: in CR I mean|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|c5|pg||
pc|d6|nt|gulyas: needs to play lots of @Ds to beat this|pg||
pc|h5|pc|d8|pc|d4|pg||
nt|pauleger: I see no play now|pg||
nt|gulyas: the more @Ds declarer has to ruff, the more trump tricks W gets|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|s6|pc|sA|pg||
pc|d7|pc|hT|pc|d5|pc|d9|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pg||
nt|gulyas: @S 10, discarding the 3rd@D|pg||
nt|gulyas: can get away with down 1|pg||
nt|pauleger: nice to have the @c9|pg||
nt|gulyas: right|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s2|pc|dJ|pc|h7|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|cT|nt|gulyas: has to feel that @Hs are 4-0 after all the thinking going on|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|d3|pc|c9|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|d2|pc|h2|pc|c8|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h8|pc|hJ|pc|dT|pg||
pc|hK|pc|dK|pc|h4|pc|h9|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|h6|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|s8|pc|dA|pc|hA|pg||
pg||
qx|c4|st||md|2S64HA6432DJ94C952,SAJHQ987DQ76CAK83,SKQT87HKJT5DCQJ74,S9532HDAKT8532CT6|sv|b|nt|chick: I would have simply raised diamonds.  North would probably show a heart or ask for a spade stoppper and they would have ended in the same place|pg||
nt|andersk: agree|pg||
mb|1N|nt|psyck: hmm, 5@c made!|pg||
nt|ralfwil: 3nt looks easier|pg||
mb|2C|an|.|mb|3C|nt|odysseus69: next door a toy - 1NT-3S showing a singeton heart - not sure a good idea when its the ace|pg||
nt|psyck: aah, just @s & @d losers as cards are|pg||
nt|andersk: not easy to bid this slam, |pg||
nt|chick: 2@c presumably showing majors|pg||
mb|3H|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|chick: 3@C probably transfer to diamonds, so now the burden is on East to make a slam try|pg||
mb|p|nt|ralfwil: after 2@s I´m not so afraid about the @h, so 3nt|pg||
mb|p|nt|andersk: almost impossible to bid this slam, 3 NT will be quite normal|pg||
nt|chick: in fact, it might not make on a trump lead, since E has to ruff 2 spades|pg||
pc|sK|nt|andersk: no problem, North has the spade entry and no trumphs to play|pg||
pc|s2|nt|chick: if W were declarer, true|pg||
pc|s6|nt|andersk: Oh yes|pg||
pc|sA|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|andersk: I didntnotise only 2 @S in south|pg||
pc|s8|pc|d2|pc|d9|pg||
pc|d6|pc|s7|pc|dA|pc|d4|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|d7|pc|c4|pg||
pc|dT|pc|h4|pc|h8|pc|h5|pg||
nt|odysseus69: should be flat board but declarer might manage a 10th trick|pg||
pc|d8|pc|h2|pc|h7|pc|hT|pg||
pc|d5|pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|d3|pc|c2|pc|sJ|pc|hK|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c5|pc|cA|pc|c7|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cJ|pc|c6|pc|c9|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o5|st||md|3SAKT98HA97DQ764CT,SQ73HT6DJ32CAJ932,SJ4HQ32DAK8CKQ875,S652HKJ854DT95C64|sv|n|nt|gulyas: down 2 anyway, could not foretell the @C10 dropping, so had no entry to hand|pg||
nt|gulyas: still, first imps to Hansen|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: coffee board|pg||
pc|h4|nt|gulyas: some would say: howcome 3NT with Qxx? what if pd is short in @H? well, stats help here: if you have a 5 card suit and a 3 card suit, which is more likely for pd to be short in?|pg||
pc|h7|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s6|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|cT|pg||
nt|gulyas: of course, with computer generated hands, some would say its 50-50:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: surrounding play tried by W|pg||
nt|gulyas: you either have a boring 3NT or a slam making in a minor with 3NT going down:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: in case N has Qxxx or Qxx in @c|pg||
nt|gulyas: yes, that was a nice play|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|s9|pc|s3|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s7|pc|h3|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sA|nt|gulyas: only giving a free run for declarer this time to his 11th trick|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c5|pc|d5|pg||
pc|sK|pc|h6|pc|c7|pc|h5|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d2|pc|d8|pc|d9|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d3|pc|dK|pc|dT|pg||
pc|dA|pc|c6|pc|d6|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|hA|pc|c2|pg||
pc|d7|pc|c9|pc|c8|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|h9|pc|cA|pc|cQ|pc|hK|pg||
pg||
qx|c5|st||md|3SAKT98HA97DQ764CT,SQ73HT6DJ32CAJ932,SJ4HQ32DAK8CKQ875,S652HKJ854DT95C64|sv|n|nt|vugraphpld: http://www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
mb|1N|nt|psyck: NS bought it cheap other room as EW could not discover @c fit|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: e-w ent quietly in CR- clubs died unborn|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|nt|andersk: wouldnt surprice me if we get another 3 NT here:)|pg||
mb|2S|nt|dburn: not sure they can here either, but East might take a shot|pg||
nt|ralfwil: easy to bid 3@s as E after 1nt from W|pg||
nt|ralfwil: sry 3@c|pg||
nt|odysseus69: might bid 2N T|pg||
nt|dburn: may be trying to remember the system|pg||
mb|p|nt|dburn: 2NT shows clubs|pg||
mb|3D|nt|vugraphpld: 2NT alerted but by W now|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|nt|odysseus69: you remembered David and so does Brian|pg||
nt|odysseus69: obviously not alerted by East|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: they play on screens:)|pg||
nt|dburn: I imagine East would have alerted it|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: so EAST dind t alerted on her side|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: guess she forgot & meant it as natural|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: she said to North, maybe he thought 2 NT were @C but I am not sure|pg||
mb|p|nt|andersk: 10 or 11 on a @H lead|pg||
pc|h5|nt|psyck: too bad, 3@c would have been a nice double partial swing|pg||
nt|dburn: I doubt that - she's just shown a 3NT bid with clubs|pg||
pc|h7|nt|dburn: not that she has a 3NT bid, but...|pg||
nt|odysseus69: maybe it doesnt apply after 1NT overcall - one of them got it wrong - only 50s|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s2|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pg||
nt|andersk: 10 cold, however the 11th trick will come in trick 12 or 13|pg||
nt|andersk: in @C|pg||
nt|andersk: might be a @C switch|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|cT|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|s9|pc|s3|pg||
pc|sK|nt|psyck: only a push now, but 3@c could have gained 6 imps|pg||
pc|s7|pc|c5|pc|s6|pg||
pc|sA|pc|c3|nt|ralfwil: but S could bid 3@h|pg||
nt|odysseus69: flat board|pg||
pc|h3|nt|chick: W can pretty much figure partner has no entry, if he has the @HKJ|pg||
pc|c6|pg||
pc|sT|nt|andersk: yes|pg||
pc|d2|nt|chick: so no point in continuing hearts|pg||
pc|c7|pc|dT|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d3|nt|psyck: vul & balanced hand, don't think S was bidding again|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d5|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pc|d9|pg||
pc|dA|pc|h4|pc|d6|pc|c2|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|hA|pc|h6|pg||
pc|d7|pc|c9|pc|c8|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|h9|pc|cA|pc|cQ|pc|hK|pg||
pg||
qx|o6|st||md|4SQ95HAKQJ4DK8753C,S63H976DJ92CJ7652,SAK842H52DQTCAKQ3,SJT7HT83DA64CT984|sv|e|nt|pauleger: this one looks more interesting|pg||
nt|gulyas: looks to be a decent 6@S|pg||
nt|gulyas: making, for a change:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|pauleger: if @s are 4-1 better be in 6NT|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|gulyas: right, @DJ finesse could help|pg||
nt|gulyas: if nothing is right|pg||
mb|2D|mb|p|nt|pauleger: last straw :)|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|nt|gulyas: if @Hs run, you need nothing else, so 6NT is the place to be|pg||
nt|gulyas: with 33HCP combined, that is not surprising|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|pauleger: S prefers to show 5-5 in the reds|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|nt|pauleger: N sees no fit, so 3NT propably last playable spot|pg||
nt|gulyas: I think 3@S would have been better|pg||
nt|gulyas: now N knows S has this distribution|pg||
nt|pauleger: eventually|pg||
mb|6N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: but why show 5-5 if partner asks you for 3c @s support?|pg||
nt|gulyas: but what does 4NT mean now? cool, we found our @Ss, I am b-wooding? or is it 'boo, leave me alone in nt'?|pg||
nt|pauleger: that´s the problem with the 3@d bid|pg||
nt|gulyas: N was not sure what S would think, so he just bid what he thought he could likely make|pg||
nt|gulyas: yes, 3@D not a good bid|pg||
pc|h8|nt|gulyas: got to the top spot anyway:) may win an imp for the overtrick coming|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h2|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h7|pc|h5|pc|h3|pg||
nt|pauleger: Additionally partner won´t give you Qxx for your bidding. sounded more like xxx AKQxx KQxxx /|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|c6|st||md|4SQ95HAKQJ4DK8753C,S63H976DJ92CJ7652,SAK842H52DQTCAKQ3,SJT7HT83DA64CT984|sv|e|nt|ralfwil: no hurry with @sA|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: http://www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|andersk: 6@S here|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/r16runda1.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|andersk: sp 3-2 is almost all you need|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2D|nt|andersk: and no ruff(s)|pg||
mb|p|nt|chick: it's easier to get to slams when each hand has an AKQ(x.) than when the suit honors are split between the hands|pg||
mb|3C|an|.|mb|p|mb|3S|nt|ralfwil: what lead from S? probably @cJ/10|pg||
nt|andersk: and 6 NT is actually much better (tx Ulf)|pg||
nt|andersk: :)|pg||
nt|chick: 6N requires only that either of the majors splits reasonably enough for 5 tricks.  In trump, if the trump suit splits badly, you are down.  In NT, you just try the other suit ...|pg||
nt|chick: instead.|pg||
mb|p|nt|psyck: yes, I guess a major lead was not tempting though E denied majors|pg||
nt|ralfwil: a passive lead after this bidding|pg||
nt|psyck: at least i assume she did|pg||
nt|psyck: 2@d game forcing stayman maybe|pg||
mb|4C|mb|p|mb|4D|nt|vugraphpld: W explained his bidding like 4@H, denies 4@S and GF |pg||
nt|dburn: 2@d shows four hearts|pg||
mb|p|nt|psyck: ok, thx|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|5H|nt|psyck: happy to escape the @s lead, but not enough sourse of tricks|pg||
nt|ralfwil: Sry must leave. Enjoy the rest of the boards. Bye!|pg||
mb|p|nt|psyck: even if manage 3 in eash minor, only 1 each in majors|pg||
nt|andersk: have south deniged @D controll?|pg||
mb|6S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: aah, 4@d now|pg||
nt|dburn: well, he may manage four diamonds|pg||
mb|p|nt|andersk: I have to wake up:)  4@D probably showes:)|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d3|nt|dburn: if he takes the normal play in the suit|pg||
nt|chick: I suspect, 3@S established trump and the remaining bids are controls|pg||
pc|d2|pc|dT|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d5|pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg||
pc|s2|nt|psyck: but has to go to them in @c & @h, & they have time to knock out @s|pg||
pc|sJ|nt|chick: so they ended in the inferior spade slam, but fortunately, no problems|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s6|pg||
nt|psyck: N did need to save more @s maybe|pg||
mc|12|nt|andersk: Im just home from work, my head is not in bridge mode yet:)|pg||
pg||
qx|o7|st||md|1SAQ2HQ73DJT642C85,SKJ7654HJ82DACJT2,S98HK94D975CAQ943,ST3HAT65DKQ83CK76|sv|b|nt|gulyas: we can see this is no MP pairs, N went for the 100% making|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: I personally won´t open 2@s with this|pg||
pc|h4|nt|pauleger: 3cards in the other major and 6 points not in your suit|pg||
nt|gulyas: it is ugly|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|h8|pg||
nt|pauleger: Some experts say, that there is no hand inbetween the 1@s and 2@s opening|pg||
nt|pauleger: But I would pass|pg||
nt|gulyas: yes, this may be the one hand you want to pass with:)|pg||
pc|c8|pc|cT|pc|cA|pc|c6|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|dA|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s8|pc|sT|pc|sQ|pg||
nt|gulyas: tanujon vékre|pg||
nt|gulyas: oops|pg||
nt|gulyas: so, this a likely push|pg||
pc|d6|pc|hJ|pc|d7|pc|dK|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|sJ|pc|s9|pg||
mc|9|nt|pauleger: I tried to understand those finnougristic languages once, but surrendered|pg||
nt|pauleger: :)|pg||
nt|gulyas: trust me, they are not easy:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/r16runda1.html for running scores from the other matches|pg||
pg||
qx|c7|st||md|1SAQ2HQ73DJT642C85,SKJ7654HJ82DACJT2,S98HK94D975CAQ943,ST3HAT65DKQ83CK76|sv|b|nt|chick: lol  Anders, if I had a nickel for every silly comment I made, I'd be rich :)|pg||
nt|andersk: :)|pg||
nt|andersk: mee too:)  maybe we should start collecting:)|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: that would have worked as NS cannot untangle @s's if played by N|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d3|nt|odysseus69: brian senior has not been recruited to the "must open balanced 11" movement|pg||
nt|andersk: quite a friendly split here!|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dA|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s9|nt|vugraphpld: explained as 17-19 by WEST|pg||
pc|sT|nt|vugraphpld: I remind both pairs play 4 card major |pg||
nt|psyck: 1@s, 2@h, 2@d, 2@c tricks for dec here|pg||
pc|sQ|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg||
pc|dK|nt|odysseus69: most weak nt players rebid 1N T on 15-17- in previous era 1NT was 15-16|pg||
pc|d2|nt|dburn: this is upgraded according to the Binkie scale|pg||
pc|c2|pc|d5|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d4|nt|odysseus69: of course- she has the 8 of clubs|pg||
nt|dburn: East has 18 and one sixth Binkie points|pg||
nt|dburn: four and a half for each ace, two thirds for each queen|pg||
pc|cT|pc|d9|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s2|nt|psyck: I bid according to the bikini scale, less & less looks better & better|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s8|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|c6|pc|c5|pg||
pc|h9|pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|h8|pg||
nt|andersk: brb|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o8|st||md|2SQJ62HKT8DJ7654C4,S984H97DQT93CAT72,SATHAQJ6432D8C853,SK753H5DAK2CKQJ96|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|2C|mb|2H|mb|3C|nt|pauleger: I would double with easts hand|pg||
nt|gulyas: so would I|pg||
mb|4H|nt|vugraphpl1: sry|pg||
mb|4S|nt|gulyas: 5@C a cheap sac here|pg||
mb|d|mb|5C|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: better lead a @h not a trump|pg||
nt|pauleger: there is some reason for a trump lead|pg||
nt|gulyas: right, they may make on a @C lead|pg||
mb|p|pc|hK|nt|pauleger: S decides to have a look at the dummy|pg||
pc|h7|pc|hA|pc|h5|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s2|pc|s4|pg||
pc|sT|pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|s8|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|c2|nt|pauleger: 8 imps to Mahaffey|pg||
pc|c5|pg||
pc|c6|pc|d4|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|h8|pg||
nt|gulyas: should be 9|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|d8|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d9|pc|h2|pg||
mc|11|nt|gulyas: no, still had a @S to lose|pg||
nt|pauleger: oh right, thought it was doubled|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: one down. sorry|pg||
pg||
qx|c8|st||md|2SQJ62HKT8DJ7654C4,S984H97DQT93CAT72,SATHAQJ6432D8C853,SK753H5DAK2CKQJ96|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1H|nt|odysseus69: good spot reached in CR|pg||
mb|d|mb|2D|an|.|mb|d|nt|psyck: yes, 5@c on the other hand would be killed on @h lead|pg||
mb|4H|nt|dburn: awkward choices ahead, but if East bids 4@s West probably ought to bid 5@d rather than insist on clubs|pg||
nt|psyck: E will play the hand at any cost with his shape anyway|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: *her|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: her|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c4|nt|dburn: good bid|pg||
nt|andersk: this game wont couse any problems|pg||
pc|cA|nt|psyck: nicely done both tables|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
nt|odysseus69: well bid twice|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d8|pc|dK|pc|d4|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d9|pc|h2|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c6|pc|h8|pc|c2|pg||
nt|andersk: 10 tricks, next|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h7|pc|h3|pc|h5|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dT|pc|hJ|pc|d2|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|hT|pc|c7|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|sT|nt|psyck: double dummy, maybe @s lead was required to prevent o/t|pg||
pc|sK|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o9|st||md|3STHA9DAKQ64CJT763,S862HQ543DJ5CAQ54,SAJ9HKJT76DT87CK8,SKQ7543H82D932C92|sv|e|mb|1H|nt|pauleger: np, you are doing a great job!|pg||
mb|p|nt|gulyas: 2@C worked out better this time than the X|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: thanks paule |pg||
mb|2C|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl1: Paule*|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl1: I hope that you aren't joking|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: tak, I an not joking:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: :P|pg||
nt|gulyas: what would you lead here? my choice is a small @S|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: 5@S?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: mybe|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: maybe|pg||
nt|pauleger: with no entry this looks normal|pg||
pc|c9|nt|gulyas: yes, but with NS neither showing length, and definitely having the A, they may have 2-2 or less @Ss, and then the K would be in order|pg||
pc|c3|nt|pauleger: E tries to find partner´s suit|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c8|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pc|sT|pg||
nt|gulyas: the 8 denies the 9, so E should not be fooled by the tricky @SJ play|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d7|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|d8|pc|d3|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|h2|pg||
pc|h9|pc|h4|pc|hJ|pc|h8|pg||
pc|hK|pc|s7|pc|c6|pc|h5|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|dQ|nt|pauleger: one imp for Mahaffey|pg||
pc|s2|pg||
pc|d4|pc|c4|pc|h7|pc|s5|pg||
pc|d6|pc|s6|pc|hT|pc|s3|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c5|pc|cK|pc|c2|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|cT|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|s9|pc|sK|pc|cJ|pc|hQ|pg||
pg||
qx|c9|st||md|3STHA9DAKQ64CJT763,S862HQ543DJ5CAQ54,SAJ9HKJT76DT87CK8,SKQ7543H82D932C92|sv|e|mb|1H|nt|odysseus69: any danger of getting too high- dont think so|pg||
mb|p|mb|2D|an|.|nt|andersk: another 3 NT i exspect|pg||
mb|p|nt|dburn: danger of getting too low, if this isn't forcing|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: 5c only 500|pg||
nt|psyck: 2N shows the 4 card @c|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|nt|andersk: maybe South get ambisions with this good distr|pg||
mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|chick: guess not|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sT|nt|andersk: easy make in this game, too|pg||
nt|andersk: quite a decision, sp 2, sp6 or sp 8, what to play??|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sA|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pc|h9|pc|s6|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|nt|andersk: My guess is that someone has been away from table or getting some info from opps|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h2|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|c8|nt|chick: the @C2 should tell his partner clubs|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
nt|chick: sorry, meant the @S2 should ask for clubs|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|c6|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h8|pc|d4|pc|h4|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|h5|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o10|st||md|4SHQDAKQJT964CAT74,SKT975HJ76D875C65,SJ6432HT542D3CQJ8,SAQ8HAK983D2CK932|sv|b|mb|1H|nt|pauleger: well|pg||
nt|pauleger: nice hand there|pg||
nt|gulyas: 8-4, bid more?:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: would work!|pg||
nt|gulyas: calling this hand a monster is an understatement:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: 3@h chosen by S in the cr seems a nice idea|pg||
nt|pauleger: asking for a stop in @h|pg||
nt|pauleger: and showing a gambling-style minor suit|pg||
mb|2D|nt|pauleger: then over 3NT she jumped to 5@h|pg||
nt|pauleger: 5@d even|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|nt|gulyas: 2@D? hmm:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: partner, do you have@hA, then we can play slam!|pg||
mb|3C|nt|gulyas: since Pepsi did not even have the stop he promised, he passed:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: :)|pg||
nt|gulyas: 3NT would have been interesting, going 6 down|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|nt|pauleger: I mean, you can´t bid slam scientifically|pg||
nt|gulyas: trying to get herself x-ed as low as possible|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|4D|nt|pauleger: but 3@d looks a bid like an underbid|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|pauleger: a bid? no some bids!|pg||
mb|p|pc|h6|nt|gulyas: 'this will not go down more than 1'|pg||
nt|gulyas: 'I have 9 tricks in hand!'|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hK|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|d2|pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d3|pg||
nt|pauleger: you don´t need much for 5@d|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d7|nt|gulyas: surprise! 4@D is making - and so is 5...|pg||
pc|s2|nt|pauleger: xxxxx in @c could be enough|pg||
pc|h8|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|s3|nt|gulyas: after the 3@C bid, maybe not|pg||
pc|h3|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|sT|pc|h4|pc|h9|pg||
mc|11|nt|pauleger: that´s right. so just bid 5@d immediately :)|pg||
nt|gulyas: Mahaffey gaining another 12, up by 34 now|pg||
nt|pauleger: as some kibbers mention, vulnerable there is no other choice than 5@d|pg||
nt|gulyas: S took a very, very, VERY deep position here (and I am being nice here:))|pg||
nt|pauleger: propably she will try to explain, that she wanted to get doubled :)|pg||
nt|pauleger: There are 18 boards to come, so everything possible|pg||
pg||
qx|c10|st||md|4SHQDAKQJT964CAT74,SKT975HJ76D875C65,SJ6432HT542D3CQJ8,SAQ8HAK983D2CK932|sv|b|nt|vugraphpld: http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/swleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/swrunda5.html|pg||
nt|andersk: this could be action|pg||
nt|chick: 5@D cold, 6@D can't make because no entry to finesse clubs|pg||
mb|1H|mb|3H|an|.|nt|chick: bid 3N with a heart stopper?|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|andersk: not easy for EW now|pg||
mb|5D|mb|p|nt|andersk: what?|pg||
mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|andersk: If that 3 NT bid actually took that long I would consider a protest!|pg||
pc|s5|nt|psyck: Last deal. Thanks to my co-commentators Ralf, David, & Victor.  Nice work again by our operator Joanna. Thanks kibs.|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|d4|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|d2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d7|nt|odysseus69: thx all|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h3|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|s3|pc|h8|pg||
nt|andersk: kinda strange that u ask partner if u have a stopper, and when he has it, u dont want it!!|pg||
nt|chick: especially when you have a helper card like the Q|pg||
mc|11|nt|andersk: agree|pg||
pg||
qx|o11|st||md|1SKJ742H5DT763CAQ2,SQ985H832D5CKJ964,SA6HAJ96DKQJ42C73,ST3HKQT74DA98CT85|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|gulyas: interestingly, both rooms in 4@S|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h5|nt|pauleger: 3@s would be @d fit in my methods|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hA|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg||
pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg||
nt|gulyas: 3@H would be @D fit in mine:) 3@S shows @S fit|pg||
pc|h8|nt|pauleger: I don´t understand 4@s at all|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hT|pc|s4|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s8|pc|c3|nt|pauleger: propably he doesn´t want S to play 5@d after the last one|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
nt|gulyas: tried a practical game - 5@D is a very good contract, even 6 could make on a good day|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg||
pc|s9|pc|d2|nt|gulyas: this is going down a lot|pg||
pc|c5|pc|s7|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|h7|pc|c2|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|d6|pc|c4|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|c8|pc|cA|mc|7|pg||
qx|c11|st||md|1SKJ742H5DT763CAQ2,SQ985H832D5CKJ964,SA6HAJ96DKQJ42C73,ST3HKQT74DA98CT85|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|andersk: looks like all players are fine with it, so we cant do anything abt that board|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|chick: perhaps there wasn't really a hesitation, or perhaps they will take a long look later|pg||
mb|3D|nt|andersk: that might be the case|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|chick: there was a play for 6@D I think|pg||
pc|h2|nt|chick: although the most obvious one, club finesse, fails|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h5|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg||
pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c3|pc|c8|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s8|pc|h6|nt|andersk: this will be down|pg||
pc|d8|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|h7|pc|s4|pc|h3|pc|h9|pg||
nt|chick: he didn't really lead the 7@H|pg||
pc|d6|pc|c6|pc|dQ|pc|d9|pg||
nt|andersk: unbeleveble|pg||
pc|d2|nt|chick: I'm sure it was the K or Q|pg||
pc|hT|pc|dT|pc|c9|pg||
nt|andersk: time to ruff|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|hJ|pc|hQ|pg||
mc|9|nt|chick: I suspect the play didn't go exactly as shown here, but I'm sure the operator will ensure the final score is right|pg||
pg||
qx|o12|st||md|2ST874HAQ62DT6CAQ8,SJ532HJ7DQ872CT63,SKQHKT4DJ9CJ97542,SA96H9853DAK543CK|sv|n|nt|pauleger: so a missed chance for N/S to gain imps|pg||
nt|gulyas: it was like: if the @C finesse loses, I am down 3 instead of 1 - if the @C finesse wins, I am down 1, and 6@D makes|pg||
nt|pauleger: true|pg||
nt|pauleger: I think the auction will get duplicated here|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|nt|pauleger: some might say, that they are afraid to double facing a passed partner|pg||
mb|d|mb|3D|mb|4C|mb|4D|nt|gulyas: with a passed pd, this should be a minimum|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dT|nt|gulyas: wow, a bit wilder bidding here|pg||
nt|pauleger: looks like another imp to Mahaffey|pg||
pc|d2|pc|dJ|nt|gulyas: with the very lucky @S lay, they get away with down 1|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|h7|pc|h4|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d7|pc|d9|pc|dK|pg||
pc|h8|nt|pauleger: so they reached the par contract|pg||
pc|hA|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
nt|gulyas: N screaming for a @S shift|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cK|pg||
nt|gulyas: also with the @DJ (and later the 9), and now the obv NOT singleton @HK|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c6|pc|c5|pc|d4|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h2|pc|d8|pc|hT|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|d3|pc|c8|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|h9|pc|h6|pc|s3|pc|c2|pg||
pc|s6|pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|sK|pg||
nt|pauleger: now safe to put in @sJ|pg||
nt|gulyas: right|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c12|st||md|2ST874HAQ62DT6CAQ8,SJ532HJ7DQ872CT63,SKQHKT4DJ9CJ97542,SA96H9853DAK543CK|sv|n|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|nt|andersk: Im on your side, C:)|pg||
mb|d|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d8|pc|d9|pg||
nt|andersk: good result for NS here|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|d3|pc|s4|pc|d7|nt|chick: perhaps, but 5@C is not hard to make|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c6|pc|cJ|pc|d4|pg||
pc|c5|pc|s6|pc|cQ|pc|cT|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|sQ|pc|sA|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o13|st||md|3SAKJ4HK832D32CQ74,ST8HJTDKJ986CKJ92,SQ972HQ7654DAQ54C,S653HA9DT7CAT8653|sv|b|nt|gulyas: Hansen going for a telephone number in the CR|pg||
nt|pauleger: 5 level with no shortness|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1D|nt|gulyas: NS can make 6@H as the cards lie|pg||
mb|d|nt|pauleger: the 2@c bid was awkward as well|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|pauleger: 8 points balanced and a bad suit vulnerable|pg||
mb|4S|nt|gulyas: but 2 aces|pg||
mb|p|nt|gulyas: to make sure they cannot make slam:)|pg||
nt|pauleger: which means slam is not working? :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|gulyas: well, as it is, they can, but not normally|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|pauleger: yeah, another good point not to bid|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h9|pc|hK|pg||
nt|gulyas: one thing you can like abt getting doubled and going for a number is, they may make slam|pg||
nt|gulyas: if you have 2 aces in hand, that chance is getting very low|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg||
nt|pauleger: everything fine here for S|pg||
nt|pauleger: don´t think she likes that|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|s8|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s5|pc|sA|pc|sT|pg||
nt|pauleger: Russia have 40 to 2 lead over Duck N Dales|pg||
nt|gulyas: the lead will be more here in a couple mins|pg||
nt|pauleger: Badger 37 Hauge 4|pg||
nt|pauleger: the rest are tighter matches|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|d7|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s6|pc|sK|pc|d8|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c13|st||md|3SAKJ4HK832D32CQ74,ST8HJTDKJ986CKJ92,SQ972HQ7654DAQ54C,S653HA9DT7CAT8653|sv|b|nt|chick: well, not if they cash their top tricks, I guess :)|pg||
nt|chick: (sorry, was only counting 1 diamond loser) :)|pg||
nt|chick: Anders, where's my nickel?  :)|pg||
nt|andersk: On it's way:)|pg||
mb|1H|mb|2C|mb|2N|an|.|mb|5C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sK|nt|andersk: normally not wasy to bid slam, 800 or more in 5@C X|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s2|pc|s3|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c7|pc|cK|pc|h7|pg||
nt|andersk: here comes 1100|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s7|pc|s5|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|d7|pg||
pc|dA|pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|d8|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h9|pc|hK|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|sA|pc|c2|pc|s9|pc|s6|pg||
mc|7|nt|chick: you called it :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: I think on 11 board was everything good|pg||
nt|chick: Thanks, Joanna :)|pg||
nt|andersk: last hand of this segment|pg||
nt|chick: This will be the last board of this set, another 14 boards to go shortly|pg||
nt|andersk: tx all for beeing with us, espesially Cornelia, and ouhr great operator, johanna!|pg||
nt|chick: Thanks to our excellent operator, Joanna Sroka, for a great job :)|pg||
pg||
qx|o14|st||md|4ST653HQT5D87CKQ75,SAQ8HJ987DKQ43CA8,S742HA3DAJ9CJ9643,SKJ9HK642DT652CT2|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c4|nt|gulyas: 2@H makes, but its hard to bid with strong NT systems|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg||
nt|pauleger: This is the last board of the first half of the match|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pc|s6|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d7|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cT|nt|pauleger: Play will resume in 45 minutes according to the bulletin|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pg||
pc|c6|pc|h2|pc|cK|pc|h7|pg||
pc|c7|pc|d3|pc|c3|pc|h4|pg||
pc|d8|pc|dQ|pc|d9|pc|d2|pg||
nt|pauleger: Thx to all kibbers, Marek for operating :), Daniel and BBO for making this possible|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: thx;)|pg||
nt|gulyas: ty all, it was a pleasure|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h5|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d6|pc|s5|pc|d4|pg||
mc|6|nt|pauleger: bye for now|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: bye|pg||
nt|vugraphpl1: see you|pg||
nt|gulyas: bye|pg||
pg||
qx|c14|st||md|4ST653HQT5D87CKQ75,SAQ8HJ987DKQ43CA8,S742HA3DAJ9CJ9643,SKJ9HK642DT652CT2|sv|o|nt|andersk: here it comes|pg||
nt|andersk: partscoore EW I beleve|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1N|nt|chick: not a big swing hand in any case|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|andersk: 1 NT might go down|pg||
pc|c4|nt|andersk: I like stayman with 4-3 in majors|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cQ|nt|chick: not me, with 7 HCP and some 10s.  1N has as much chance as 2 of a suit|pg||
pc|cA|pg||
pc|s8|nt|andersk: I cant see any chanses for declearer here|pg||
pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|s5|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d8|nt|chick: same distribution and 3 HCP, sure|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cT|nt|andersk: I play it a bit different in teams than MP turnaments|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pg||
nt|andersk: at MP I pass 1 NT|pg||
nt|chick: 1N is hard to double for penalty, and less likely to push the opps into bidding|pg||
pc|c3|pc|h2|pc|cK|pc|d3|pg||
pc|c7|pc|h7|pc|c6|pc|h4|pg||
pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|d9|pc|d5|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s9|pc|s3|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|sK|pc|s6|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dJ|pc|d6|pc|hT|pg||
pc|c9|pc|dT|pc|h5|pc|hJ|pg||
mc|6|nt|andersk: bye|pg||
nt|chick: so we end the set with Mahaffey well in the lead, join us for the 2nd half in a few minutes|pg||
nt|vugraphpld: next match at 18.00|pg||
pg||
