vg|D EC 2011 Open Teams RR _,7_7,I,1,10,Netherlands,0,Lazy,0|
rs|3NE+2,3NE+1,3SE-1,3NW-4,2HS+1,3NS=,2DE=,1NW-2,4SN+1,6SN-1,6SWx-1,6HSx=,4HE+2,4HE+2,4SN+3,4SN+3,3NW+1,3NW=,4HE-2,4HE-2|
pn|F Bakkeren,Khiuppenen,T Bakkeren,Kholomeev,KHOKHLOV,WESTRA,MATUSHKO,BERTENS|pg||
qx|o1|st||md|3SA652H743DJT4CT87,SJ943H86DQ7CAJ632,SQT8HQT52D9652CQ4,SK7HAKJ9DAK83CK95|sv|o|nt|danilo1: Hi all|pg||
nt|rado: welcome all, round 7 of RR|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3C|an| |nt|danilo1: Zdr :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|an| |mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|rado: puppet Stayman action will reach 3 nt for some10-11 tricks|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|rado: championship site and live results at http://www.poznan2011.pl/|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: hi all :)|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d2|pc|d3|pg||
nt|danilo1: got tempo on lead  .. must leave @DQ at the table ... so probably 10 tricks |pg||
pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|dA|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cA|nt|danilo1: well .. other way round ... maybe even better .. now @H and @D discards and @H finess|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|d6|pc|h9|pc|h4|pg||
pc|c6|pc|d9|pc|s7|pc|s5|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h5|pc|hA|pc|h3|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d4|pc|s3|pc|s8|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o2|st||md|4SQJH9753DAQJ92C96,SHT4DK87654CAQJ75,SA6432HQJ86DTCK42,SKT9875HAK2D3CT83|sv|n|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|rado: agressive bidding might get to high now|pg||
mb|2D|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3S|nt|danilo1: once East decided to open (I would as well) ... no way for different bidding I thk ... |pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c9|nt|rado: W might bid 1NT as well over 1@S |pg||
nt|rado: they stopped undoubled so no danger:)|pg||
pc|c5|nt|danilo1: I would even do one more bid as West (4@C) ... 5@C is no go only cause unlucky card lay-out |pg||
pc|cK|pc|c3|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h4|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|dT|pg||
pc|c6|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pc|c8|pg||
pc|dK|pc|s3|pc|h2|pc|d2|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cT|pc|sJ|pc|c7|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d5|pc|h6|pc|s5|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sQ|pc|d6|pc|sA|pg||
nt|danilo1: North shorthened, @SQ exposed, ... so -1 only|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|c2|st||md|4SQJH9753DAQJ92C96,SHT4DK87654CAQJ75,SA6432HQJ86DTCK42,SKT9875HAK2D3CT83|sv|n|nt|MolvaM: and could bring the advantage of pushing opps to 5@h|pg||
nt|hedyg: on an A@S lead N could have played K@S and then..............the result would be -2|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: K@S preferential for @D of course|pg||
nt|roswolf: a trappy bd for n/s|pg||
nt|roswolf: too easy to play in 3nt|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|nt|odysseus69: they played board 10|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this loks very dubious too|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: very weak opening or problems here also|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: which may well make with the diamonds 3-3|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Patience please|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Operator catching up'|pg||
nt|Walddk1: They started with board 10 here for some reason|pg||
nt|Walddk1: We think the operator redealt to the werong board|pg||
nt|Walddk1: but that everything is OK now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: got the right players in the right seats - all we need is the right cards- we are patient tolerant sympathetic and understanding|pg||
mb|p|pc|hQ|nt|hedyg: EW are by some considered to now be the best European pair|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|nt|roswolf: certainly they have some fine results in their locker:)|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
pc|hK|nt|hedyg: they sure do|pg||
nt|roswolf: might take the heart finesse first|pg||
nt|hedyg: i am having problems connecting to BBO Mobile, is it only me?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: everything works|pg||
nt|hedyg: or better, problems connecting to a table|pg||
pc|h5|nt|hedyg: ok :(|pg||
pc|hT|pc|h6|pg||
nt|Walddk1: West's name is   Westra|pg||
nt|Walddk1: North's is  Matushko|pg||
nt|Walddk1: East and West are correct|pg||
nt|Walddk1: N-S are from Russia|pg||
nt|odysseus69: doesnt look like way to play 3NT|pg||
nt|odysseus69: guess the contract is a new test|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: auction is wrong... but contract is good|pg||
nt|odysseus69: not that 3NT is a likely spot - 4C possibly but then why heart king|pg||
nt|runnerup: good -but not makeable |pg||
mc|5|nt|MolvaM: even clubs|pg||
nt|odysseus69: probably trick 2 was losing club finesse|pg||
pg||
qx|o3|st||md|1S32HT763DAQCAT532,SQ765H854DT93CJ87,SKT84HAK9DK8752CK,SAJ9HQJ2DJ64CQ964|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores running scores|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|rado: time for NS to bid game now|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|nt|danilo1: after pass, I would rather bid 2@C than 1@H|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|rado: N sequense usually showing 15-16 4351 or similar|pg||
nt|danilo1: pass ... not 2NT?|pg||
pc|h5|nt|rado: seems I'm wrong|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: pass :)|pg||
nt|danilo1: I must leave now ... Thx Rado & Specs, enjoy|pg||
nt|rado: tx see you|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
pc|hA|nt|rado: some communication problems for declarer but when @D 3-3 will make more than enough tricks|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h3|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|c7|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|d3|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|d4|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c8|pc|s4|pc|c6|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h4|pc|hK|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|c3|pc|dT|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c3|st||md|1S32HT763DAQCAT532,SQ765H854DT93CJ87,SKT84HAK9DK8752CK,SAJ9HQJ2DJ64CQ964|sv|e|nt|odysseus69: 3rd time lucky?|pg||
nt|stc: Flat 3NT because of friendly @ds|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|hedyg: 15 imps is huge in 10 board matches|pg||
nt|hedyg: you can practically say the match is over except for a miracle|pg||
mb|2C|nt|MolvaM: on the positve side, they have 9 boards to recover|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: while the opps twiddle their thumbs?|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|nt|stc: even 4@h would make|pg||
nt|odysseus69: mini NT is at least credible and Syayman looks OK so on track now|pg||
nt|runnerup: destany was 4 down some misfif and 10+10  |pg||
nt|odysseus69: 3NT from North will confirm all is well|pg||
mb|3D|an| |mb|p|nt|odysseus69: 3NT from South if 3D suggested diamonds + 4 spades|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: well, its a difficult life being a positivist :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: well north did bid 3@C over 2@H led to 5@CX=|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: 3nt +1 is my guess|pg||
nt|odysseus69: some communication problems- expect a club lead|pg||
nt|stc: good defense may keep dec in 9 tricks|pg||
pc|c7|nt|stc: just because the communication problems dec has no choice but @ds|pg||
nt|odysseus69: we can see 3-3 diamonds - declarer cant and will be a little nervous about cashing club ace|pg||
nt|stc: no need to cash the A@c, play all @d then AK@h and @H|pg||
nt|runnerup: i think also that 3 @d doent promice spades,just diamonds and forcing,because yu cant force otherways with only 5 cards|pg||
nt|odysseus69: ok as cards lie - everthing is ok- but if hearts 4-2 then danger of losing 2 hearts and 3 spades- |pg||
nt|odysseus69: however I agree that he shouldnt cash club ace|pg||
nt|stc: there is no danger to loose 2@h and 3@h because defenders has no communications|pg||
nt|runnerup: 26 was not enought to bid game in other table -so leaders will win this board -bacauce 9 at least here|pg||
nt|stc: 2@h and 3@s I mean|pg||
pc|cK|nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c2|pg||
nt|odysseus69: right -no danger when diamonds 3-3 |pg||
pc|d2|pc|d4|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg||
nt|stc: and with @d 4-2 he needs 3@h tricks and K@s on side|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h5|nt|roswolf: team bessis have 9 more boards to score more is more likely:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: he played a bit too quickly|pg||
nt|stc: wrong, only K@s on side|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dQ|nt|MolvaM: diamonds are usually 4-3 but today they are 5-2|pg||
pc|d9|nt|runnerup: he must trust  @d 3-3 anyway|pg||
pc|d5|pg||
nt|granguru:  hi all|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c8|nt|roswolf: west doesnt have a trump to return|pg||
nt|hedyg: he can ruff 1|pg||
pc|s4|nt|hedyg: ooooooops|pg||
nt|MolvaM: not if smirnov played a spade|pg||
nt|hedyg: ruffing 1@d is security!|pg||
pc|c4|pg||
nt|odysseus69: now he has to cash|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h4|nt|roswolf: another strange line|pg||
nt|MolvaM: roller coaster|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pg||
nt|runnerup: it is not nice to play but wins |pg||
nt|stc: cash and prey |pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|s2|pc|dT|pg||
pc|d8|nt|hedyg: could ruff 1 @d and claim 10 tricks|pg||
pc|c9|nt|MolvaM: each side presenting the contract to the other side|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed - maybe nerves|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s5|pg||
pc|d7|nt|odysseus69: and all is well with the world|pg||
pc|s9|pc|c3|pc|h8|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hJ|nt|hedyg: i didnt see Smirnov presenting anything..|pg||
nt|MolvaM: finally smirnov piekarek decide to accept the gift|pg||
pc|h7|nt|MolvaM: if he played a spade, piekarek could play the last trump to kill the @d ruff|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o4|st||md|2SQT763H75DQT95C98,SJ952HK8DK832CKJ7,SAK8HAQJT4DJCT432,S4H9632DA764CAQ65|sv|b|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|boedhy:  hi all|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
mb|p|nt|Walddk8: Welcome to Ruud|pg||
nt|rado: hello:)|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  hi rado|pg||
mb|d|mb|p|nt|rado: automatic ballancing DBL|pg||
mb|2D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  he choose the right one otherwise south would have had a takeout double i think|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h8|nt|boedhy:  do you know waht will happen after this rado?|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pg||
nt|rado: defence should play trumps at some time|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|hK|pg||
nt|boedhy:  i mean with the teams?|pg||
nt|Walddk8: Welcome to Robin|pg||
nt|rmb1: hi|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h6|nt|boedhy:  hi robin|pg||
nt|rado: as far as I know lat round in the goups now|pg||
nt|rado: last|pg||
pc|c8|pc|d2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|d4|pc|d5|pg||
pc|d3|pc|c2|nt|rado: Hi|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d9|pg||
pc|h9|mc|8|pg||
qx|c4|st||md|2SQT763H75DQT95C98,SJ952HK8DK832CKJ7,SAK8HAQJT4DJCT432,S4H9632DA764CAQ65|sv|b|mb|p|nt|granguru:  NS are beating the 1993 world champions|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|stc: how many teams qualify for the Swiss A phase ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: 3 :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: unusual to pass on South as in OR |pg||
nt|runnerup: ew has board this qwuite cheap--ns has 8-9 in majors |pg||
nt|odysseus69: most moderns bid 1S but maybe playing strong club|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  well in fact a kib rectifies me ..only westra was on that team|pg||
nt|stc: great result for EW in OR|pg||
mb|1N|nt|granguru:  Muller also a memeber is playing in the winning Netherlands red team|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: yes but he must have though E has A@D not A@S!!|pg||
nt|hedyg: since S did not try a @d finesse nor to ruff out K@D|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but whouldnt declarer have started the diamonds right away?|pg||
nt|hedyg: so why did he play small to the J?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: anyway. its history now and bessis got another 12|pg||
nt|hedyg: it was only obvious to us who saw all cards i think|pg||
nt|MolvaM: right hedy :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3@c trial?|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes the play is so important at this level -you must take care in all contracts|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: seems obvious|pg||
nt|granguru:  at the time they were the youngest team ever to win a BB|pg||
nt|stc: NS may cash the first 10 tricks here !!|pg||
nt|odysseus69: spade lead works well|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s4|pc|s3|nt|runnerup: tis is 4- some down -is s! out|pg||
pc|s2|pg||
nt|MolvaM: on the positive side there are 7 more boards to play :)|pg||
nt|stc: petit appel :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 down |pg||
nt|stc: but sry, only 8 tricks|pg||
nt|runnerup: can he see it ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
pc|sA|nt|roswolf: well showing his shortage(if he could)may have worked better|pg||
pc|d4|nt|hedyg: the E hand is limited by not opening 1@c (16+)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but Kx in trial suit is a nice holding no?|pg||
nt|hedyg: you want to be in game opposite max 15?|pg||
nt|stc: if left alone, dec can make max 6 tricks, still -1|pg||
pc|s6|nt|odysseus69: his partner did encourage I assume - |pg||
pc|s5|pg||
nt|runnerup: no but still down 1 |pg||
pc|s8|pc|d6|pc|sQ|pc|s9|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes but hedy's point is valid too -nv probably no big deal anyway|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h8|nt|stc: wd|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|hK|pg||
nt|hedyg: with 18+ for sure he opened 1@c|pg||
nt|hedyg: they play a multiway 1@c|pg||
mc|5|nt|stc: 7 more IMP|pg||
nt|runnerup: yes declarer had 6 but didnt take those so -2|pg||
pg||
qx|o5|st||md|3SQJ9763HA43DCAT95,S42HQ975DJ942CQJ6,SAT5HKT8DAQ83CK82,SK8HJ62DKT765C743|sv|n|nt|boedhy:  and then thirst 4 threw too a swiss with some promotion ...?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|rado: yes as per the schedule "swiss" coming soon|pg||
nt|rmb1: 4@S looks likely for NS|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins  |pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|nt|boedhy:  even 6 something to look for with south?|pg||
mb|p|nt|rado: S would try some slam investigation|pg||
mb|4D|an| |mb|p|mb|4H|an| |mb|p|nt|rmb1: 4@D splinter|pg||
nt|rado: but too much waste in @D so 4@H seems to get them high|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  north will like his hand also after the splinter not if he knowes that it is renonce|pg||
nt|rmb1: 4@H "last train" ?|pg||
nt|boedhy:  think this is difficult...|pg||
nt|rado: if Q@D was Q@C for example slam would be playable|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  you have flat hand but good controls...|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
pc|c4|nt|boedhy:  6@S is on finesse and something happening in @c not that bad|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
nt|rmb1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Train|pg||
nt|boedhy:  first 3 go to swiss a and the rest to swiss b |pg||
pc|cT|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d7|pc|s3|pc|d2|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sK|pg||
pc|c7|nt|boedhy:  so this is important match for both|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c8|pc|c3|mc|11|pg||
qx|c5|st||md|3SQJ9763HA43DCAT95,S42HQ975DJ942CQJ6,SAT5HKT8DAQ83CK82,SK8HJ62DKT765C743|sv|n|nt|odysseus69: didnt get chance to take|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: results page http://www.poznan2011.pl/results|pg||
nt|roswolf: that 2@H SEEMS TO BE A 1 SUITER|pg||
nt|roswolf: needs a 2 suited overcall|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3nt and 5@d are ok|pg||
mb|2H|nt|chilloncan: very aggressive reopening double there, at all green and facing a PH. risk-reward ratio not obviously in favor of action|pg||
nt|roswolf: a firm 3@D followed by a firmer 3nt!?|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|nt|roswolf: even if for t/o dont like dbl|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: looks a flattie|pg||
mb|2N|an| |mb|p|nt|MolvaM: what would happen if smirnov could bid 4@h? would olech bid 4@s?|pg||
nt|roswolf: we will never know|pg||
nt|stc: slam is not good but decent here|pg||
mb|3S|nt|roswolf: n/s will miss 3nt|pg||
nt|MolvaM: maybe olech should have bid 3NT now|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes i think so|pg||
nt|hedyg: Piek wont let them play anyhow|pg||
nt|MolvaM: so difficult for south to bid it from his side|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bubbo de Boer, westra, Leufkens, Peter jansen, Westerdorf, Muller, Jaap trounborst were the boys|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: may try 3@S -YUK!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: and Smirnov will..........pass|pg||
nt|roswolf: WELL PROBABLY BUT EAST MAY THEN TRY A T/O DBL!?:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: imo when opps want to play in your 6 card suit you should let them :p|pg||
nt|roswolf: south knows he is being mugged but ...........|pg||
nt|hedyg: that independant caps key again Geoff?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: both N/S players created problems and now its a guess if they can reach a makable game|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes it has a life of its own:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: or the devil made you do it? :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: south hopefully will bid soon|pg||
nt|odysseus69: a fraction better than spade finesse|pg||
nt|stc: slam needs K@s + @s 2-2 or some sort of friendly @c, about 40% I guess|pg||
mb|4C|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: hands must be bid on the same day that they were dealt :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: so much for 3NT|pg||
nt|roswolf: well 5@D is not a bad spot looking at the n/s cards alone|pg||
nt|hedyg: depending on the lead|pg||
nt|hedyg: i dont play lower level lightners, only vs slam|pg||
nt|roswolf: in the other room 3NTreached with simple elegance|pg||
mb|4D|an| |mb|p|mb|4H|nt|roswolf: disaster looms|pg||
nt|hedyg: the timid double by E in OR did not help the defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: luckier to play from South when club queen would give contract|pg||
nt|granguru:  More amendments: Wubbo de Boer, Enri leufkens, Piet Jansen and ans|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: fielders choice almost|pg||
nt|MolvaM: the disaster started with south's double|pg||
mb|4N|nt|hedyg: now he runs to 5@D|pg||
nt|hedyg: ?|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westendorf|pg||
nt|granguru:  thanks a lot|pg||
mb|p|nt|MolvaM: last chance to make a doubled 5@d|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westerhof sorry|pg||
nt|stc: on the way to -13 IMP|pg||
nt|odysseus69: if North had cQ rather than dQ it would be huge slam|pg||
nt|granguru:  NPC Jaap Trouwborst|pg||
nt|stc: yes, and hard to localize the unknown Q|pg||
nt|odysseus69: can make on diamond lead but dont think they will get one|pg||
nt|stc: he can't make even on @d lead|pg||
mb|6S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: Souths think shows a void and wondering how to respond -no point in showing|pg||
pc|d7|nt|hedyg: how many @ds does N need to bid them?|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm well i have been in worse contracts|pg||
nt|stc: he got the @D lead, still -1|pg||
nt|runnerup: not huge possobilities ,now made anyway|pg||
nt|granguru:  Very Bridge Cultivated people I see....I also had the BB in my hands on that ocation, but just to take me a photograph with it!|pg||
nt|granguru:  ocasion*|pg||
nt|odysseus69: sorry - cant even make on diamond lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  should lose 1 in each black suit|pg||
nt|granguru:  no endplay|pg||
nt|granguru:  no no|pg||
nt|stc: he needs QJ@H and QJ@c in the same hand, not the caase|pg||
nt|granguru:  he can drop 2 @C|pg||
pc|h3|nt|hedyg: i am not mad about the double over 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: unerring|pg||
nt|granguru:  wron |pg||
nt|runnerup: ok seems impossible to get rid of 2 loosers|pg||
nt|granguru:  wrong play|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg||
nt|stc: and the @H looser ?|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|s3|pc|d2|pg||
nt|MolvaM: smirnov wanted to get rich instantly but this will also help|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|roswolf: sensible|pg||
nt|hedyg: you know they will run if you double|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sK|pg||
nt|granguru:  y no way|pg||
pc|s8|nt|roswolf: just -1 and another 11 imps to team bessis|pg||
nt|MolvaM: do you want to hear my latest update on the positive side of things? :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: still 4 more boards remain |pg||
nt|MolvaM: 5 rather|pg||
nt|roswolf: lol - 4x24imps would be enough to win 25-0 indeed|pg||
pc|s6|pc|s4|nt|hedyg: 9 imps/bd? thats a lot|pg||
pc|sA|pg||
nt|stc: of course he has 11 tricks and defense must be awake|pg||
nt|granguru:  depended on the @S finesse or some favourable position of the @C|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|cT|pc|d4|pg||
nt|granguru:  such as stiff @CQJ or @CH and @CHxxx|pg||
nt|granguru:  abd guessing it|pg||
nt|granguru:  and guessing it|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h5|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|h6|pg||
nt|stc: or as i said a sqz @H/@C, just move the J@h in W and he makes|pg||
pc|sT|pc|dT|pc|sJ|nt|granguru:  bridge Gods didnt mind Matushko going down thou|pg||
pc|d9|pg||
pc|s9|pc|h9|pc|c2|nt|stc: nasty 10@c discard|pg||
nt|odysseus69: prefer OR bidding where N orth simply showed slam ambitions with a diamond shortage|pg||
pc|c4|pg||
pc|s7|nt|granguru:  11 IMPs and Of-the-schneider!|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|hT|nt|runnerup: so makes match more even|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c6|mc|11|nt|granguru:  NS vul so 13 IMPs|pg||
pg||
qx|o6|st||md|4S43HAKJ64DAQ8C732,SAJ952H83D97CKJ84,S8HQT952D2CAQT965,SKQT76H7DKJT6543C|sv|e|nt|rmb1: More more slam investigation for NS|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|nt|rmb1: Enough entries to South to take @C finesses to make 6@C ?|pg||
nt|boedhy:  at the end of the swiss first 27 of the a and the 5 best from B will go on to the knock out. |pg||
mb|4C|an| |nt|rado: here both lines wil have much to bid:)|pg||
nt|boedhy:  4@c jump fit|pg||
nt|boedhy:  south will like that|pg||
nt|rmb1: 4@C natural with @H fit|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|rado: 10 tricks in @S and @H and 11 at @C I think|pg||
nt|boedhy:  will EW save over 6@h ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|boedhy:  they should but not easy red against green|pg||
mb|6S|nt|boedhy:  ah ok ..... very easy it seems :-)|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|rmb1: South's Pass forcing?|pg||
pc|cA|nt|boedhy:  oops only 1 off now....|pg||
pc|s6|pc|c7|pc|c4|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s8|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pc|h2|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c5|pc|h7|pc|c2|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d2|nt|boedhy:  Khiuppen even hopes of making...|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|c6|pc|d4|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c6|st||md|4S43HAKJ64DAQ8C732,SAJ952H83D97CKJ84,S8HQT952D2CAQT965,SKQT76H7DKJT6543C|sv|e|nt|hedyg: well ok, just 8.5...|pg||
nt|hedyg: piece of cake|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup and very nearly impossible without the Total Improbability Drive |pg||
mb|1D|nt|roswolf: which is a fine Concept by the late Douglas Adams|pg||
nt|odysseus69: action board|pg||
mb|1H|mb|d|an|5 !S|nt|stc: a true freak now|pg||
mb|2D|an|transfer|nt|granguru:  would you open N or E hands given the opportunity?|pg||
mb|4S|nt|roswolf: a chance for some imps to the polish team|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|stc: OR NS didn't discover the -2 defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: both|pg||
nt|granguru:  I think no one would pass these days|pg||
mb|5H|mb|5S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: never mind these days- I would have opened 50 years ago|pg||
nt|odysseus69: its opening on balanced 11 counts that I cant master|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bertens should -1 soon if he plays the hand|pg||
mb|6C|nt|stc: in OR N lead the A@c|pg||
nt|granguru:  but NS have slam ambitions again|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  ARE WE DEFENDING OR ATTACKING?|pg||
nt|runnerup: wild one clubs never mensioned and if you guess-whitch you never do 6 clubs makes |pg||
nt|stc: 6@c are cold, double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: ok -it came up now|pg||
nt|granguru:  matushko did not bid 5@C but makes them appear now...|pg||
nt|granguru:  Now Bertens must decide to defend|pg||
nt|odysseus69: will South sit?? - I think no|pg||
mb|p|mb|d|nt|roswolf: another wierd switch|pg||
mb|6H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|stc: X was giving the wining line in 6@C !!|pg||
nt|granguru:  WESTRA made a big error |pg||
nt|runnerup: south did but run him self hmm..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: intersting now|pg||
pc|d9|nt|granguru:  thinking no slam was there he doubled 6@C|pg||
nt|runnerup: north i mean the bidder|pg||
nt|josj: E should have X'd 6@H for the lead...|pg||
nt|stc: and next big error, on the way to +1 now|pg||
nt|josj: and we can see now why...|pg||
nt|odysseus69: East failed to double - which might have alerted partner to club lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  only way to beat was to lead a @C..double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: this makes or + 1 now|pg||
nt|stc: about 25 IMP was hanging on the lead|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|dQ|pg||
nt|hedyg: now a @d|pg||
pc|h4|nt|hedyg: ok no @d :(|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hT|pc|h7|pg||
pc|h2|pc|d4|pc|hA|pc|h8|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|nt|granguru:  but now KHolkhlov has to make the deep finesse to win|pg||
pc|s8|pc|d5|pg||
nt|odysseus69: Ace of spades maybe more sensible choice|pg||
nt|stc: -1 was 7 for EW, now 17 for NS|pg||
nt|granguru:  @SA was also an opportunity to beat...if @C were then followed.|pg||
nt|granguru:  But there was a great chance that it will be ruffed|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|cA|pc|s6|pg||
nt|stc: After A@s @c is mandatory|pg||
pc|h5|pc|s7|pc|hK|pc|s2|pg||
nt|odysseus69: maybe East should have take out insurance with 6S|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|o7|st||md|1SQ5432HJDT53CJT98,ST8H653DAJ97CA654,SAK96H94DQ8642CK3,SJ7HAKQT872DKCQ72|sv|b|nt|boedhy:  things not going well for the netherlands|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|1H|nt|vugraphpl2: still 4 boards before us :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: all can change :)|pg||
mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|rado: 4@s cheap  here|pg||
mb|p|nt|rmb1: NS need to bid @S to play in 4@S|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d7|pc|d8|pc|dK|pg||
pc|hA|pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|h4|pg||
nt|boedhy:  difficut would anyone bid 1@s with south?|pg||
nt|rmb1: +1 now|pg||
pc|hK|pc|s3|pc|h5|pc|h9|pg||
pc|h2|pc|s2|pc|h6|nt|boedhy:  even plus 2...|pg||
pc|s9|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|s7|pc|d5|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pc|h7|pc|dT|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c8|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d4|pc|sJ|pc|s4|pg||
mc|12|nt|rmb1: wp|pg||
pg||
qx|c7|st||md|1SQ5432HJDT53CJT98,ST8H653DAJ97CA654,SAK96H94DQ8642CK3,SJ7HAKQT872DKCQ72|sv|b|nt|roswolf: but still 2 imps to the trailing team|pg||
nt|hedyg: those 2 imps wont help them a lot|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|4H|nt|stc: 6@s played by E are always -2 for a loss of 8IMP|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|d3|nt|vugraphpl3: hi all|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d8|pc|dK|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
pc|hA|pc|hJ|nt|odysseus69: Queen a bad idea|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h4|pg||
nt|granguru:  Wshould have simply passed 6@C|pg||
pc|hK|nt|hedyg: really K@S?|pg||
pc|s4|pc|h5|pc|h9|pg||
pc|h2|pc|s2|nt|chilloncan: hi all:)|pg||
nt|chilloncan: welcome to cloudy poznan|pg||
pc|h6|nt|stc: and hopy on a @s lead|pg||
pc|d4|pg||
nt|stc: hope|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|o8|st||md|2SKJ54HA64D43CAT43,ST2HJ87DA987CJ765,SA8763HKQT32DQ6C2,SQ9H95DKJT52CKQ98|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|nt|boedhy:  will be very difficult to reach the first 3|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|rmb1: 4@S looks routine for NS|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|nt|grebrof: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
mb|3C|an| |nt|rado: maybe some investigation for @d no control|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|an| |mb|p|mb|3H|an| |mb|p|mb|3S|an| |nt|grebrof: 3@c maybe minimum|pg||
mb|p|nt|boedhy:  nobody still save in this group|pg||
mb|4C|an| |mb|p|nt|boedhy:  well this will be a wash or maybe 1 or 2 imps..|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  although at Zia's table he will bid 4@d now and will make slem without @d lead. Although probably a lot people would lead @d against Zia these days... :)|pg||
pc|c8|pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c2|pg||
nt|grebrof: "always lead @d vs Zia"?|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s9|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sT|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h7|pc|hQ|mc|13|pg||
qx|c8|st||md|2SKJ54HA64D43CAT43,ST2HJ87DA987CJ765,SA8763HKQT32DQ6C2,SQ9H95DKJT52CKQ98|sv|o|mb|p|nt|granguru:  It might be possible that they play the Slam Spade convention where a x asked for a @S lead..no double, no interest in a @S lead...|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: should be a straightforward push|pg||
nt|runnerup: too easy looking game to give dutch any hope to get back imps|pg||
mb|2C|nt|granguru:  The IMP magazine will be hard on himself in Westra's column next issue|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: stayman...and then i play over 2@d 4@c= 6@H+4@S, 4@D=6@S+4@H|pg||
mb|2H|nt|odysseus69: can t see any chance of getting too high here|pg||
mb|p|nt|chilloncan: this is more like it:)|pg||
nt|roswolf: stayman with 6-4!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: sure! pd can have 4@hs|pg||
nt|hedyg: or you smolen and over 3NT you bid your singleton..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 imps available for a diamond lead|pg||
mb|2N|nt|hedyg: all depending on agreements|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  N can make 6@S |pg||
mb|3H|nt|roswolf: a magical mystery tour|pg||
nt|hedyg: Michel Bessis just transferred @s and bid 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed as would i|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: just east migth lead k @c so if you bid slam,even that makes but no probable |pg||
nt|granguru:  as E will probably lead a @C|pg||
nt|stc: good time for a psych @d cue bid|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|chilloncan: easy to see why S bid 5C though a responsive double will probably gain when N has a 5-card major. The fact that E bid only 4D at favorable, though, might suggest to Robson that he ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: would not be averse to defending 4M. meanwhile a very brisk 5C call might fetch a lucrative sacrifice, hopefully a phantom|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: perhaps no need for jokes|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2/1 sequences seem t feature a 2NT bid on second round from responder - then an expression of his values|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c2|pg||
nt|roswolf: save me from this sequence quick|pg||
nt|hedyg: Simone please can you send me 1 of those nice Lavazza boys i saw in the pictures? with an espresso!|pg||
nt|granguru:  now 5@S by S asks for a @D stopper.. pass = no, and the @D lead is obvious...|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s2|nt|chilloncan: 6S is another aggressive action, in light of already having bid 5C freely. But S could have plenty of hands for 5C that are not nearly this good for spades....three spades and a ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: ruffing value, plus the whole club suit may come in. sometimes 13 would be easy|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s9|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|nt|chilloncan: for example, if EW had one more club and one fewer heart, this would make|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sT|pg||
nt|odysseus69: auction seems to be calling for diamond lead but no|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|h5|pg||
nt|granguru:  but if N says 6@S=yes, paradoxically E is inhibited to lead a @D|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: E wants Director|pg||
nt|runnerup: east  was not listening i think |pg||
nt|granguru:  Fiction bridge thou|pg||
mc|13|nt|odysseus69: problem with explanation of 2NT maybe|pg||
pg||
qx|o9|st||md|3ST62HK764DKJ8CJ42,SA7H53D64CAKQT876,SKJ98HAJDT9752C95,SQ543HQT982DAQ3C3|sv|e|nt|rmb1: CR bid to 6@S-1 on  5.  13IMP to Netherlands|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|nt|rmb1: 1@D transfer to @H|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|nt|boedhy:  good lead the @d lead :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|boedhy:  oh it was the finesse board lucky for the netherlands...|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|grebrof: nice bidding - 3nt: I have around 8 tricks with a running @c-suit|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 2 boards before us and 5 IMP different :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|rmb1: but three other comparisons to come|pg||
nt|boedhy:  anyone for a @d lead :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: yes :)|pg||
pc|s9|pc|sQ|pc|s6|nt|boedhy:  this is not the killer....|pg||
pc|s7|pg||
nt|rmb1: +1|pg||
nt|grebrof: 9 aces anyway, but ok - I can understand N too - a lot less help needed from P in the @s-suit|pg||
nt|boedhy:  offcourse there was no killer.. |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c4|nt|boedhy:  so this will be a push i think..|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|h2|pc|c2|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|d7|pc|s3|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|cT|pc|d2|pc|s4|pc|h7|pg||
pc|c8|pc|d5|pc|d3|pc|sT|pg||
pc|c7|pc|s8|pc|h8|pc|d8|pg||
pc|c6|pc|d9|pc|s5|pc|h4|pg||
pc|sA|pc|sJ|pc|h9|pc|s2|pg||
pc|h3|mc|10|pg||
qx|c9|st||md|3ST62HK764DKJ8CJ42,SA7H53D64CAKQT876,SKJ98HAJDT9752C95,SQ543HQT982DAQ3C3|sv|e|nt|chilloncan: 1N-3N awaits|pg||
nt|odysseus69: my limited understanding gives me the impression that 2NT is often like 4th suit forcing only at a lower level|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|granguru:  score of hand 10 is wrong hand is not played yet|pg||
mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|roswolf: the more i see it a gambling 3nt in a minoe hasnt much to recommend it -now showing a major is a different matter|pg||
mb|3C|nt|chilloncan: 9 trix await|pg||
nt|chilloncan: since E has only 2 diamonds|pg||
nt|runnerup: ..3nt ..so nothing special|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|nt|hedyg: gambling, not promising those outside queens|pg||
mb|3N|nt|chilloncan: oops a snag there. was expecting spade ace to block the suit|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: same contract different route|pg||
pc|dT|nt|runnerup: so 1 more imp for a good lead|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this type of laydown usually takes a long time with increasing delays from about 4th club on|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d4|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d6|nt|odysseus69: dummy q|pg||
pc|d2|pc|dA|pg||
nt|hedyg: wrongsided 3NT...but normal|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o10|st||md|4SQ64HKT2DK973CT84,S753HQ873D85CAQ32,S982H65DAT64CKJ75,SAKJTHAJ94DQJ2C96|sv|b|nt|vugraphpl2: last board before us|pg||
nt|rmb1: Surely passed out in OR is a glitch|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: the next round should begin at 17:00 :) so in 2hours and 20 minutes :)|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|rmb1: They haven't played 7,8,9|pg||
mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|rmb1: Thanks to operator Maria, thanks to fellow commentators Ruud, Radoslav, Espen.  Thanks to EBL and BBO for organising|pg||
nt|grebrof: at board 6 Westra didnt "run away with the money" in 6@c - if dbl opps at some level, make sure they cant make a higher contract :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: they haven't played in closed room yet...|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cQ|nt|rmb1: On  6 closed room managed to make 6@HX. 14IMP to Lazy|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c6|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|s3|pg||
nt|grebrof: they were in 6@cs NS, but Westra dbl, so they ran to the making 6@h :)|pg||
pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
nt|rmb1: 6@H only making with first trick @D finesse|pg||
nt|grebrof: "making" I should say - Westra could have led @cs|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: runinng scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c2|pc|c7|nt|rado: tx all see you |pg||
nt|grebrof: nothing right for declarer here|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: east is still thinking :)|pg||
nt|grebrof: ruff, @h to Q and @d to hand?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 10th board in closed room isn't played... there is a wrong result...|pg||
nt|grebrof: too bad @s has the last @h|pg||
pc|h9|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|s5|pc|s2|pg||
nt|rmb1: Needs to try the @S finesse|pg||
nt|grebrof: @s being S|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pc|s7|pc|s9|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: still 2 boards to compare...|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hQ|pc|h6|pc|h4|pg||
pc|h7|pc|d4|pc|hA|pc|hT|pg||
pc|sT|pc|d3|pc|c3|nt|boedhy:  so big lose fot the netherlands. although board 6 should have made it close...will be a hard struggle to get into the knock out..|pg||
pc|d6|pg||
mc|8|nt|rmb1: thanks all bye|pg||
nt|boedhy:  thx all bye|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: see you soon :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: at 17 :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bye :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c10|st||md|4SQ64HKT2DK973CT84,S753HQ873D85CAQ32,S982H65DAT64CKJ75,SAKJTHAJ94DQJ2C96|sv|b|nt|chilloncan: while away i reconsidered my analysis. i think now that the percentages are in fact in favor of Allfrey's playing small from dummy at trick one|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: last board of this match now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: time saver - thank you Westra|pg||
mb|1N|nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Simona!to my excellent fellow commentators Geoffrey and Murat for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: boards.our appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C|nt|chilloncan: haste makes waste:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back for the last round of the RR in 32 minutes|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H|nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|hedyg: 3NT looks right with the W hand|pg||
nt|roswolf: IF an early heart switch the contract should go down|pg||
pc|c4|nt|roswolf: good point hedy|pg||
nt|hedyg: is this early enough?|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: Bessis in 3@HX in the OR|pg||
nt|odysseus69: switch n/s and they have an overtrick|pg||
nt|runnerup: tx all -last looks like a bit too ambitious 4 hearts but can happen here also|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cK|nt|chilloncan: why is the team name "skwark"? Allfrey-Robson play on the Allfrey team|pg||
pc|c6|pg||
pc|s8|nt|odysseus69: well judged all round|pg||
nt|chilloncan: hi victor:)|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pc|s3|pg||
pc|c8|nt|odysseus69: spade spade defeats 4H|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|nt|hedyg: he was saving his father from 3@C X|pg||
pc|c9|pg||
pc|h3|nt|chilloncan: on  19 N got a reprieve when W shifted to a D. then N had to decide who had the club ace|pg||
nt|runnerup: so Lazy goes on as a winner and dutch drops out |pg||
nt|odysseus69: thx all - had a little excitement|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
nt|hedyg: E did not open there|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c2|pc|c7|pc|h4|pg||
mc|8|nt|hedyg: p-3@C-p-p-X-p-p3@H-p-p-X|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: thx everyone|pg||
pg||
